How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Campbell, B256272 (Cal. App. 2016):
nondiscriminatory reasons are genuine, an appellate court should begin its analysis of the trial court's denial of the Batson/Wheeler motion with a review of the first-stage ruling." (People v. Scott (2015) 61 Cal.4th 363, 391.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for approval of a motion by the California Supreme Court on a motion to approve a motion for approval by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from the denial of a motion for acquittal, does the reviewing court apply the same standard as the trial court? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a suppression motion on appeal, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appeal against a finding that a trial court's ruling on a motion of appeal was 'unlawful, arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd'? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
