How have the courts treated the natural and probable consequences doctrine in the context of aiding and abetting liability?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Young, G040888 (Cal. App. 2018):
1. The prosecutor also relied on uncharged conspiracy principles, which mirrored the natural and probable consequences theory he tendered with respect to aiding and abetting liability. (See generally People v. Rivera (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1350, 1356 [noting conspiracy and aiding and abetting are analogous to each other when it comes to the natural and probable consequences doctrine].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal test for criminal liability under the "natural and probable consequences" doctrine in an aiding and abetted case? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who intended to aid and abet (the target crime)? (California, United States of America)
What is the nature and probable consequences of the natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a person who aids and abets criminal conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does the natural and probable consequences doctrine apply to a defendant who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the natural and probable consequences doctrine in the context of an attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
