What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine?

Under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, an aider and abettor is guilty not only of the target offense he actually intends, but also of "any other offense that was a 'natural and probable consequence' of the crime aided and abetted." (People v. Prettyman (1996) 14 Cal.4th 248, 260.) Liability "'is measured by whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have or should have known that the charged offense was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the act aided and abetted.'" (People v. Medina (2009) 46 Cal.4th 913, 920 (Medina).) "Whether a nontarget offense is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the target offense is a fact-specific inquiry to

Page 11