What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Morales, B253249 (Cal. App. 2016):
Liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine is determined by an objective standardi.e., "whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have or should have known that the charged offense was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the act aided and abetted.' [Citation.]" (People v. Medina (2009) 46
Page 26
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the nature and probable consequences of the natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequence doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for liability under the natural and probable consequences doctrine? (California, United States of America)
