California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Freeman, B279667 (Cal. App. 2018):
Defendant raises three arguments in response. First, he asserts that the People did not exercise reasonable diligence because they waited too long to start looking for Chloe. In his view, the People should have served Chloe with some sort of subpoena right after she testified at the preliminary hearing. For support, he cites People v. Louis (1986) 42 Cal.3d 969. We reject
Page 9
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.