How have the courts applied the substantial evidence standard of review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rezaipour v. L. A. Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, B281589 (Cal. App. 2018):
Nevertheless, Rezaipour contends that the trial court applied the substantial evidence standard of review instead of exercising its independent judgment. In so arguing, Rezaipour points to the trial court's alleged reliance on the residuum rule, which requires that "the substantial evidence supporting an agency decision must consist of at least 'a residuum of legally admissible evidence.' " (The Utility Reform Network v. Public
Page 28
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In applying the substantial evidence standard of review, does the court need to view the evidence in the light of the prevailing party? (California, United States of America)
What is substantial evidence applied for a substantial evidence application to review whether an employer failed to pay a certain amount of wages? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding of substantial evidence under a substantial evidence standard of review? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of or substantial evidence standard apply to a review of a trial court ruling on the unclean hands defense? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review applied to a court's determination about presumed father status? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review applied to challenges to the sufficiency of evidence in a juvenile proceeding involving criminal behavior? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
