Does the abuse of or substantial evidence standard apply to a review of a trial court ruling on the unclean hands defense?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from City Breeze, LLC v. Shahi, B259117 (Cal. App. 2016):
8. There appears to be disagreement as to whether the abuse of discretion or the substantial evidence standard applies to appellate review of a trial court ruling on the unclean hands defense in situations where the defense may legally be raised. (See Brown v. Grimes (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 265, 275.) The trial court's ruling here is supported under either of those deferential standards.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence including one that turns on hearsay? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the "abuse of standard" applied by appellate judges to review a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence of a handgun? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
In applying the substantial evidence standard of review, does the court need to view the evidence in the light of the prevailing party? (California, United States of America)
Can a court abuse its discretion by applying an erroneous legal standard or by making a ruling unsupported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
