How have courts treated the liability of direct perpetrators and accomplices in civil cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Landry, H037131 (Cal. App. 2013):
As noted in People v. Lucas (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 721, 737, "direct perpetrators and accomplices have long been treated by statute as principals equally liable under the
Page 17
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated the issue of joint and several liability for full restitution in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a civil case, how has the court treated the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge in a civil case dispose of civil liability as a function of restitution in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court treated the case law in the context of civil rights cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the argument in the context of an argument in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated self-serving statements by a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the error that contributed to the outcome of a jury's verdict in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
