In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Roe 58 v. Doe 1, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 945, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 311, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1119 (Cal. App. 2011):
In another contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9, the court in Rosenblum v. Safeco Ins. Co. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 847, 858, 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 427, held that the provision "did nothing more than reopen the filing window, for a one-year period, to those otherwise viable cases that had become time-barred." (Original italics.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Does section 394 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply to the California Department of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found guilty under section 352.2(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure for a prior assault? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant in a civil action be found to have breached section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does the active participation provision in section 654 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure provide an exemption to the application for Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1717 of the California Civil Code apply to actions which arise out of a contract but which are sound in tort rather than contract? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
