How have the courts treated the error that contributed to the outcome of a jury's verdict in a civil case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Harris, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 200, 886 P.2d 1193, 9 Cal.4th 407 (Cal. 1994):

"To say that an error did not 'contribute' to the ensuing verdict is not, of course, to say that the jury was totally unaware of that feature of the trial [9 Cal.4th 426] later held to have been erroneous. When, for example, a trial court has instructed a jury to apply an unconstitutional presumption, a reviewing court can hardly infer that the jurors failed to consider it, a conclusion that would be factually untenable in most cases, and would run counter to a sound presumption of appellate practice, that jurors are reasonable and generally follow the instructions they are given. See Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 211, 107 S.Ct. 1702, 1709, 95 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987) ('The rule that juries are presumed to follow their instructions is a pragmatic one, rooted less in the absolute certitude that the presumption is true than in the belief that it represents a reasonable practical accommodation of the interests of the state and the defendant').

Other Questions


If a defendant has been found not guilty by a jury in a civil case, is he entitled to appeal against the verdict of the jury in his case against the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a jury verdict in a civil case where the court failed to instruct the jury on the lesser included misdemeanor charge of battery without injury? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury in a civil case be re-examined by the Court of Appeal if the jury in the case has been discharged without prejudice? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court's error contributed to a jury's error? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Is it sufficient for the jury to consider the error in finding that the jury considered evidence from which it could have come to a verdict without reliance on reliance on the error? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of errors in a jury verdict in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated voir dire in jury selection in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.