How have the courts treated the argument in the context of an argument in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jackson, 264 Cal.Rptr. 852, 49 Cal.3d 1170, 783 P.2d 211 (Cal. 1989):
The People urge that the argument was merely fair comment on the evidence (People v. Wein (1958) 50 Cal.2d 383, 396, 326 P.2d 457), i.e., that defendant did not afford the officer any consideration when he
Page 872
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court treated the case law in the context of civil rights cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the argument in the context of an electronic search in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In a civil case, how has the court treated the use of DNA evidence in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court treated prior sexual assault cases in the context of domestic violence cases? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a prosecutor's criticism of defense counsel's argument in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
