Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hardy, 233 Cal.Rptr.3d 378, 418 P.3d 309, 5 Cal.5th 56 (Cal. 2018):
This concern applies here. By failing to respond when given the chance, counsel deprived the trial court of the opportunity to consider arguments in an adversarial context. Judges necessarily rely on the arguments of counsel. ( Uttecht v. Brown , supra , 551 U.S. at p. 18, 127 S.Ct. 2218.) The failure also denied the prosecutor the opportunity to defend herself against defendants claims that
[5 Cal.5th 81]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether a Section 1170.95 sex offender has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief, does the trial court have to consider the jury instructions given at the petitioner's trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to accept arguments of counsel in a personal injury trial where the argument runs counter to instructions from the court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered the argument that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an in camera hearing? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its power to consider a defendant's further due process argument in the context of evidence that joinder has been prejudiced? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court considered the argument that appellant waived his right to counsel at trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a finding of insufficient representation by trial counsel, in what circumstances will the Court consider the merits of appellant's appellate argument? (California, United States of America)
