How has the evidentiary objection ruling been reviewed for abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Morris v. Soc'y, B286621 (Cal. App. 2018):
A trial court's rulings on evidentiary objections are reviewed for abuse of discretion. (Carnes v. Superior Court (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 688, 694.) The record discloses no abuse of discretion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Are evidentiary rulings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's ruling on evidentiary objections based on papers alone reviewed for abuse or reviewed de novo? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review an evidentiary ruling for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are some evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of an evidentiary ruling being reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
How do we review an evidentiary ruling for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling admitting evidence of other crimes reviewable for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary rulings in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What analysis is required for our review of the trial court's rulings on evidentiary objections? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
