California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gonzales, D068927 (Cal. App. 2017):
In People v. Diaz (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 362, 377, we described the manner by which this court reviews a trial court's evidentiary ruling for an abuse of discretion: "A proper exercise of discretion is ' "neither arbitrary nor capricious, but is an impartial discretion, guided and controlled by fixed legal principles, to be exercised in conformity with the spirit of the law, and in a manner to subserve and not to impede or defeat the ends of substantial justice." ' [Citation.] Exercises of discretion must be ' "grounded in reasoned judgment and guided by legal principles and policies appropriate to the particular matter at issue." ' "
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.