Is evidence of an oral agreement not admissible to alter the terms of a written agreement?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Harvest Holdings Ltd. v. Bohun and Carpendale, 1984 CanLII 2475 (SK QB):
It is settled law that evidence of an oral agreement is not admissible to alter the terms of a written agreement unless the oral agreement is collateral to the written agreement and its terms do not contradict and are not inconsistent with the terms of the written agreement. Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal (1969), 1969 CanLII 2 (SCC), 66 W.W.R.(N.S.) 673.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is parole evidence admissible to vary or modify the express terms of a written contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is parol evidence admissible to vary or modify the express terms of a written contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of not having a written agreement on terms? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is parol evidence admissible to challenge a mortgage agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a plaintiff alleges an oral agreement, can they prove the agreement by any relevant evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that a party to a business agreement is bound by the terms of the agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word “unoccupied Crown lands” in the terms of par. 12 of the Canada-Canada Agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a husband sends his wife all he earns to the wife when he goes abroad, what are the terms of their separation terms? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Courts of Equity’s jurisdiction on the terms of a personal injury agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is evidence of a subsequent declaration of intent admissible to enhance damages? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
