In Rex v. Smith, supra, the word “unoccupied” was interpreted as meaning “idle,” “not put to use,” “not appropriated,” and it was held that when the crown in right of the province appropriates or sets aside certain areas for special purposes, as for game preserves, such areas can no longer be deemed to be “unoccupied Crown lands” within the meaning of par. 12 of the agreement. Following the decision in Rex v. Smith, supra, a provincial forest created under the provisions of The Forest Act and a fur conservation area created under The Fur Act, 1950, cannot be deemed to be “unoccupied Crown lands” within par. 12 of the agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.