Wide though the rule or doctrine of Tulk v. Moxhay, supra, may be, the mere fact that the owner of a parcel of land, for good and valuable consideration, gives to the owner of adjoining land a covenant restricting the use to which he may put his land does not necessarily mean that the benefit of such restrictive covenant will automatically pass to successive owners of the land of the covenantee merely because it is shown to be advantageous to that land.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.