Is parole evidence admissible to vary or modify the express terms of a written contract?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ceapro Inc. v. Saskatchewan (Government), 2008 SKQB 237 (CanLII):

Generally speaking the rule is that parole [sic] evidence is not admissible to vary or modify the express terms of a written contract. If the parties have reduced the terms of their contract to writing in clear and unambiguous manner, the express terms define the mutual obligations of the parties. Oral evidence in contradiction of the terms is inadmissible. Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal, 1969 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1969] S.C.R. 515.

Other Questions


Is parol evidence admissible to vary or modify the express terms of a written contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the terms of a contract where the contract is not enforceable and the contract does not specify terms? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is evidence of an oral agreement not admissible to alter the terms of a written agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is parol evidence admissible to challenge a mortgage agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a vendor have to rescind the terms of a contract when the vendor has terminated the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the implied or expressed terms of a deposit under a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a contract be made even if the contract is more precise than the contract itself? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for breaching the terms of a contract where a contractor is required to bore 150 feet (50m) of rock to complete a well? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a contract to sell peas has a description clause that says that the peas are not ordered or sold by description, can the contract still be enforceable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a contract to agree to agree when it is missing a term as to who would pay legal and/or transfer fees? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.