See also judgment of Lamont, J.A. at p. 985. I cannot distinguish the facts in Winkler v. Hutton from the facts in the present case and must hold that there was an implied covenant on the part of the defendant to go the distance his machinery would bore, namely, 150 feet; the defendant when he contracted to dig the well knew that it might cave in or that he might strike rock and these are risks which, in my opinion, the defendant assumed; he could by his contract have protected Himself in regard to such contingencies but he did not do so.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.