The following excerpt is from United States v. Johnson, 19-3952-cr, 19-4357-cr (2nd Cir. 2021):
did not exceed the bounds of its "great deal of latitude in scheduling trials," as a court "need not grant a continuance so that a defendant may be represented by counsel of his choosing, where such a continuance would cause significant delay." United States v. Griffiths, 750 F.3d 237, 241-42 (2d Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.