As I understood counsel for both parties, it was agreed between them that the issue herein is a justiciable one which must be decided by federally appointed judges and while such judges may have the same or a similar potential interest in the outcome, the court must act ex necessitate: see Re Constitutional Questions Act; Re Income Tax Act, 1932, 1936 CanLII 154 (SK CA), [1936] 4 D.L.R. 134 at p. 135, [1936] 2 W.W.R. 443; affirmed sub nom. Judges v. A.-G. Sask., 1937 CanLII 368 (UK JCPC), [1937] 2 D.L.R. 209, [1937] 1 W.W.R. 508, [1937] W.N. 109 (P.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.