In reviewing whether a state trial judge should have sua sponte conducted a competency hearing, can a federal court consider only the evidence that was before the trial judge?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Cornwell v. Warden, No. 2:06-cv-00705 TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. 2018):

In reviewing whether a state trial judge should have sua sponte conducted a competency hearing, a federal court may consider only the evidence that was before the trial judge. United States v. Lewis, 991 F.2d 524, 527 (9th Cir. 1993). Whether a defendant is capable of understanding the proceedings and assisting counsel depends on "evidence of the defendant's irrational behavior, his demeanor in court, and any prior medical opinions on competence to stand trial." Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162, 180 (1975). None of these factors is determinative, but any one of them may be sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt regarding competence. Id.

In addition, although the opinion of the defendant's counsel certainly is not determinative, the defendant's counsel is in the best position to evaluate a client's comprehension of the proceedings. See, e.g., Hernandez v. Ylst, 930 F.2d 714, 718 (9th Cir. 1991) ("We deem significant the fact that the trial judge, government counsel, and [the petitioner's] own attorney

Page 203

Other Questions


Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the role of a federal district court in determining whether a federal judge has jurisdiction to delay a federal hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects a federal claim, does the federal court have any authority to review the state's record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.