Does the exclusion of irrelevant evidence deprive defendant of his right to present a defense?

What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)

Does the exclusion of third party culpability evidence in a criminal case violate a defendant's right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)

Does a rejection of some evidence concerning the defense affect a defendant's right to present his defense? (California, United States of America)

Does the exclusion of defense evidence on a minor or subsidiary point impair an accused's due process right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)

Does the exclusion of a single item of marginally relevant evidence under California Evidence Code section 352 preclude a defendant from presenting his "consensual sexual relationship" defense? (California, United States of America)

Does a defendant have a constitutional right to present irrelevant evidence in the defence? (California, United States of America)

Does application of the ordinary rules of evidence violate a defendant's constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant present a defense based on physical evidence that is inadmissible under the ordinary rules of evidence? (California, United States of America)

Does a defendant have a constitutional right to present highly probative evidence in support of his mistake of law defense? (California, United States of America)

Does a defendant have a constitutional right to present all relevant evidence in his defense? (California, United States of America)