What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense?

Therefore, "`[w]e . . . reject defendant's various claims that the trial court's exclusion of the proffered evidence violated his federal constitutional rights to present a defense . . . . There was no error under state law, and [courts] have long observed that, "[a]s a general matter, the ordinary rules of evidence do not impermissibly infringe on the accused's [state or federal constitutional] right to present a defense."' [Citations.]" (People v. Prince, supra, 40 Cal.4th at p. 1243.)