Does application of the ordinary rules of evidence violate a defendant's constitutional right to present a defense?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Russell, 2d. Crim. No. B262474 (Cal. App. 2017):
8. We reject appellant's claim that the alleged error violated his constitutional right to present a defense and his right to compulsory process. (See People v. Lawley (2002) 27 Cal.4th 102, 155 [application of the ordinary rules of evidence does not impermissibly infringe upon a defendant's constitutional rights].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does application of the ordinary rules of evidence violate a defendant's constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Does a state court's application of the ordinary rules of evidence violate the federal constitutional right to present a complete defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the ordinary application of the rules of evidence violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant present a defense based on physical evidence that is inadmissible under the ordinary rules of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a state court's application of ordinary rules of evidence generally infringe a defendant's general right to offer a defense through his or her witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to present all relevant evidence in his defense? (California, United States of America)
