Does the exclusion of defense evidence on a minor or subsidiary point impair an accused's due process right to present a defense?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Pinski, G056453 (Cal. App. 2019):
evidence of an accused's defense theoretically could rise to this level, excluding defense evidence on a minor or subsidiary point does not impair an accused's due process right to present a defense."' [Citation.]" (People v. Thornton (2007) 41 Cal.4th 391, 443.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the exclusion of evidence intended to establish an accused's defense on a minor or subsidiary point interfere with that accused's right to due process law? (California, United States of America)
Does exclusion of defense evidence on a minor or subsidiary point interfere with an accused's right to due process law? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of evidence intended to establish a defense in a sexual assault case interfere with the accused's right to due process? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of evidence intended to establish a defense interfere with the accused's right to due process law? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of irrelevant evidence deprive defendant of his right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of a single item of marginally relevant evidence under California Evidence Code section 352 preclude a defendant from presenting his "consensual sexual relationship" defense? (California, United States of America)
Does a rejection of some evidence concerning the defense affect a defendant's right to present his defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of third party culpability evidence in a criminal case violate a defendant's right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for the exclusion of evidence intended to establish an accused's defense? (California, United States of America)
