Does the City have a substantial government interest in reducing crime in its neighborhoods?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Alameda Books, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 222 F.3d 719 (9th Cir. 2000):
The City has a "substantial government interest" in reducing crime in its neighborhoods. See Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50, 71 (1976) ("[T]he city's interest in attempting to preserve the quality of urban life in one that must be accorded high respect."). At issue is
Page 724
whether the regulations are "designed to serve" this interest. We hold they are not.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is appellant's role in the crime reduced to a reduced level of responsibility for the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that regulation serves a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the government's argument in support of its contention that the federal government does not have the authority to compel pretrial disclosure of the identity of government witnesses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a conspiracy to commit a crime a different crime from a crime that is the object of the conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is Doe's substantial assistance to the government sufficient to prevent the government from seeking a second Rule 35(b) motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What interest does the government have in reducing DUI violations and ensuring officer safety during investigations? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can the government charge a particular predicate crime but prove an uncharged predicate crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a defendant guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if they have made a substantial step towards the commission of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review on both the substantial and substantial evidence and the substantial evidence test? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a defendant denies committing the crime with which he is charged but asserts that if he did commit the crime he was entrapped into doing so, can he rely on these inconsistent defenses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
