The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Doe, 351 F.3d 929 (9th Cir. 2003):
We now address the issue of whether the district court erred in considering factors other than Doe's substantial assistance to the government in denying the government's second Rule 35(b) motion. Whether a particular factor is a permissible basis for departure is an issue of law reviewed de novo. See United States v. Malley, 307 F.3d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir.2002).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.