California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Xavier James Fort, E065567 (Cal. App. 2018):
Defendant argues that the amendment constituted structural error, necessitating reversal per se. However, the term "structural error," for which reversal per se is required, refers to certain federal constitutional errors that will always invalidate a
Page 19
conviction. (See Sullivan v. Louisiana (1993) 508 U.S. 275, 279 [113 S.Ct. 2078, 124 L.Ed.2d 182].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.