Does harmless error review apply in the federal circuit?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Flood, 18 Cal.4th 470, 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 180, 957 P.2d 869 (Cal. 1998):

The federal circuit courts are divided concerning the proper application of harmless error review for instructional errors. An example of the conflicting [18 Cal.4th 496] approaches to the issue is United States v. Johnson (4th Cir.1995) 71 F.3d 139, where the defendant was convicted of armed robbery of a credit union. An essential element of the offense required the credit union to be federally insured. The prosecution presented uncontradicted evidence of the credit union's insured

Page 197

Other Questions


What is the standard of review in the federal and state courts for determining whether a federal error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the federal harmless error standard for determining that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What standard of review applies to a federal finding of federal error? (California, United States of America)
In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative? (California, United States of America)
Does a federal decision construing a state forfeiture statute apply the same weight and authority as it applies to a federal forfeiture statute? (California, United States of America)
How have courts applied harmless error review to a failure to instruct on a defense theory? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid argument that if a trial court erred, if the error was harmless, is that error harmless? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.