In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lebeck, H045329 (Cal. App. 2019):
Finally, Lucas argues that the cumulative effect of the trial court's errors require reversal. Since we have found no error, there is no error to cumulate. (See e.g., In re Reno (2012) 55 Cal.4th 428, 483; People v. Sedillo (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1037, 1068.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving reversible error in a motion to appeal against a finding of error at the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is Page 5 of the Superior Court of Appeal bound by error and error in denying a certificate of probable cause to appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a de novo review of the findings of the Court of Appeal of a finding that a plaintiff was sexually assaulted during her pregnancy? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General dismiss appellant's appeal against the Court of Appeal finding that his claim has not evaded review and indeed was specifically rejected in Goodrich? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal review the judgment of the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of any review? (California, United States of America)
