Does a university have a right to obtain a written statement of reasons for not overturning peer review committees?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Gray v. Board of Higher Educ., City of New York, 692 F.2d 901 (2nd Cir. 1982):
9 Since the faculty has the primary responsibility for judging candidates, Haimowitz v. University of Nevada, 579 F.2d 526, 530 (9th Cir.1978), the right to obtain a written statement of the President's reasons for his decision not to overturn the peer review committees, a right available under the collective bargaining agreement, is insufficient; he may simply rely, and will usually be relying, solely on the faculty committee's decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law on whether a written statement obtained from appellant without the presence of counsel is a violation of his Miranda rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a motion to dismiss a civil rights claim brought by the University of Alaska Regents alleging that the university was involved in civil rights violations sufficient to be dismissed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing administrators’ interpretations of legislation, does the reviewing court need to slip from reasonableness into correctness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for determining whether adequate reasons were provided to the Court for failing to provide adequate reasons? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for requesting a brief written statement of reason from a local or appeal board making a decision adverse to the claim of a registrant? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reasonableness review in criminal cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
