When reviewing administrators’ interpretations of legislation, does the reviewing court need to slip from reasonableness into correctness?

Does the "new rule" limitation on habeas review by the federal courts validate reasonable, good-faith interpretations of existing precedents made by state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

How have the courts interpreted the interpretation of reasons in cases involving judicial review in the immigration context? (Canada (Federal), Canada)

What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)

Can a reviewing court interpret the legislative provisions in the same way as an administrator? (Canada (Federal), Canada)

When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

How has reasonable doubt been interpreted by courts in defining reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

How have the courts interpreted agency interpretation in the context of national security legislation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)

Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)