Does a motion in limine exclude evidence of economic loss due to the failure of a plaintiff to produce his personal financial documents?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Carmichael Canterbury Vill. Owners Ass'n v. Joseph, C077981 (Cal. App. 2020):
Sauer v. Superior Court (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 213, 222, held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a motion in limine to exclude evidence of economic loss due to the plaintiff's failure to produce his personal financial documents during discovery. The appellate court was not persuaded by the plaintiff's argument on appeal
Page 23
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there a "situation" where a plaintiff has been ordered to produce evidence under the Arizona Evidence Code under section 402 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion in limine to exclude evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding identification evidence in a motion to exclude identification evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of producing evidence in a motion to suppress evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of the proponent of evidence in a motion to overturn a finding that excluded evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude evidence that supports a plaintiff's claim of failure to give informed consent? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion in limine be used to exclude evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is a defendant permitted to refer to his failure to introduce evidence that was excluded on the prosecutor's motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
