California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Snoeck v. Exaktime Innovations, Inc., B302178, B304054 (Cal. App. 2021):
ExakTime argues Snoeck has forfeited his challenge to the court's denial of his motion because he did not secure a ruling from the court on the record, citing People v. Ramos (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1133, 1171 (motion in limine may preserve objection for appeal, but party "must secure an express ruling from the court"). In Ramos, although the defendant filed a pretrial motion to exclude evidence, and defense counsel had discussed it with the court, counsel did not reassert his objection when the prosecution introduced the evidence at trial. (Ibid.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.