California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mina, F074901 (Cal. App. 2018):
made the same error as the probation officer with respect to the violation constituting count 3, the court must have found the conduct underlying count 4 occurred on a separate occasion, as the probation report stated. Such speculation flies in the face of settled legal presumptions. (See generally Ross v. Superior Court (1988) 19 Cal.3d 899, 913.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.