Is it ineffective defense counsel for failing to alert the court that not all 12 oral copulation counts occurred on separate occasions?

^10. Mendez argues that defense counsel was ineffective for "failing to alert the court that not all 12 oral copulation counts occurred on separate occasions." To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that (1) counsel's performance was deficient, falling below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms; and (2) the deficient performance resulted in prejudice. (Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 U.S. 668, 687.) Here, as we have explained, the One Strike law does not apply to counts 1 through 12, and accordingly, it was reasonable for defense counsel to chose not to point out that some of the oral copulations occurred on the same occasion.