What are the consequences of a Federal Court finding that a federal court violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights by imposing fees and fines without making a determination of his ability to pay?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Eagle, A157735 (Cal. App. 2020):

Appellant contends that, under People v. Dueas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157, the trial court violated his federal constitutional rights by imposing various fees and fines without making a determination of his ability to pay. We conclude appellant has forfeited his Dueas-related claims.3

Other Questions


Can a defendant appeal against a finding that the Court improperly imposed fines and fees without determining whether he had the ability to pay them? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a plaintiff's claim that the court violated his constitutional due process and equal protection by imposing excessive fines on him? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that a court erred in imposing fines and fees without determining whether he has the ability to pay them? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a federal prosecutor's behavior violates the federal Constitution? (California, United States of America)
If a court imposes a restitution fine under Penal Code section 1202.4, must the restitution fine be the same amount as the parole revocation fine? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a court's decision to reinstate probation after a defendant has violated probation and been ordered to pay a restitution fine and court fees? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to make a claim that the use of a styrofoam head violates a plaintiff's constitutional right to sue for damages? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.