I do not find this to be a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant this motion to change. I return to the case law respecting the nature of a change in circumstances which would allow variation proceedings to change custody under s. 17 of the Divorce Act. McLachlan J. stated in Gordon v. Goertz that “the change must have altered the child's needs or the ability of the parents to meet those needs in a fundamental way”. In Roloson, Chappell J. suggested that the change must be “significant and long lasting”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.