To properly examine this, we must return to what McLachlan J. stated in Gordon v. Goertz about what type of change is sufficient to change a custody order. Among other factors, she stated that the change must be “either not foreseen or could not have been reasonably contemplated by the judge who made the initial order.” For the change to be sufficient to support a motion to change, it must not have been foreseeable or not contemplated at the time of the order.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.