[130] Custody and access decisions are inherently an exercise in discretion. Case-by-case consideration of the unique circumstances of each child is the hallmark of the process. This discretion vested in the trial judge enables a balanced evaluation of the best interests of the child and permits courts to respond to the spectrum of factors that can both positively and negatively affect a child. See Van de Perre v. Edwards, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, 2001 SCC 60, 275 N.R. 52, 156 B.C.A.C. 161, 94 B.C.L.R. (3d) 199, [2001] 11 W.W.R. 1, 255 W.A.C. 161, 204 D.L.R. (4th) 257, 19 R.F.L. (5th) 396, [2001] S.C.J. No. 60, 2001 CarswellBC 1999, at paragraph [13].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.