In SGEU v. Saskatchewan & SAHO, supra, the Board went on to make the following conclusions following an extensive survey of jurisprudence: In summary, the cases demonstrate that while Boards generally will not delve into the reasonableness of the bargaining positions taken by either party during collective bargaining, Boards may find that a specific proposal does constitute bad faith bargaining if: (1) the proposal contains some illegality; (2) the proposal in itself or in conjunction with other conduct indicates a subjective unwillingness to conclude a collective agreement; and (3) the proposal is or should be known to go against bargaining standards in the industry and to be generally unacceptable to either include or refuse to include in a collective agreement, i.e. it has the effect of blocking the negotiation of a collective agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.