What is the patent unreasonableness standard in the interpretation of a collective agreement?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Canada Safeway Ltd. v. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 454, 2004 SKQB 102 (CanLII):
A board of arbitration decision should be reviewed on the patent unreasonableness standard to the extent it relates specifically to the interpretation of the terms of a collective agreement: Toronto(City) Board of Education v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, District 15, 1997 CanLII 378 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 487 at 507:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a collective agreement have to be interpreted as binding or binding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the standard conditions in an agreement between two parties? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How do courts determine whether a matter arises out of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a compromise agreement in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a collective bargaining agreement includes freedom of speech or freedom of expression? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is evidence of an oral agreement not admissible to alter the terms of a written agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a parol agreement where a landlord was induced to sign a lease with a promise that rabbits would be destroyed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have words like “my surviving children” been interpreted in a will and how have they been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a claim for breach of a collective agreement be brought in superior court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
