What is the standard of review for a Minister's decision whether surrender would be unjust or oppressive?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Italy v. Seifert, 2007 BCCA 407 (CanLII):
The standard of review of the Minister's decision whether surrender would be unjust or oppressive is correctness: Ganis v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 216 C.C.C. (3d) 337, 2006 BCCA 543.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a Minister made an unreasonable or unjust decision in making a decision not to seek assurances that the likely penalty would not make the surrender unjust or oppressive? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a Minister's surrender decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a Minister’s decision to surrender a suspect? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a Minister's decision to order a fugitive surrendered for extradition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What standard of review applies to a Minister's decision to surrender? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable standard for reviewing a government's decision on whether it had a duty to consult? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
