The parties agreed that the patently unreasonable standard of review applies to the Minister’s decision to surrender, but that the correctness standard should be applied to the Minister’s parallel role of considering Charter issues raised at the surrender stage: Hanson v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2005 BCCA 440, 195 C.C.C. (3d) 46 at para. 20.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.