As I have noted, the parties agree that the applicable standard of review asks whether the decision was reasonable. This is a deferential standard of review, concerned with “the existence of justification, transparency and intelligibility within the decision-making process”. It asks “whether the decision falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law”: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 at para. 47.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.