The following excerpt is from Adams Lake Indian Band v. British Columbia (Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), 2013 BCSC 877 (CanLII):
The petitioner argues that both the duty to consult and adequacy of consultation are reviewable on a correctness standard, citing Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53 at para. 48, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 103. I agree that the applicable standard is correctness in reviewing the government’s decision on whether it had a duty to consult, but I conclude that the standard of review of decisions going to the adequacy of consultation is reasonableness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.