The following excerpt is from Hugo G. v. Saul, Case No.: 20cv153-MDD (S.D. Cal. 2021):
404.1529(a). Lay witness testimony as to how a claimant's symptoms affect the claimant's ability to work is competent evidence and cannot be disregarded without providing specific reasons germane to the testimony rejected. See Van Nguyen v. Chater, 100 F.3d 1462, 1467 (9th Cir. 1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.