The following excerpt is from Dolma v. Holder, 12-5121 NAC (2nd Cir. 2014):
argues that her testimony was consistent, "support for a contrary inferenceeven one more plausible or more naturaldoes not suggest error," Siewe v. Gonzalez, 480 F.3d 160, 168 (2d Cir. 2007). We therefore defer to the agency's inconsistency finding.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.