The breadth of the court’s interpretation in favour of arbitration, where it is provided in a contract, was illustrated in Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc., 2011 SCC 15, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531. Binnie J., for the majority, stated (at para. 2): The choice to restrict or not to restrict arbitration clauses in consumer contracts is a matter for the legislature. Absent legislative intervention, the courts will generally give effect to the terms of a commercial contract freely entered into, even a contract of adhesion, including an arbitration clause. ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.